Skip to content Skip to cookie consent
Skip to content

The plastics treaty finance mechanism

A report for plastics treaty negotiators regarding access to finance for waste pickers and other grassroots groups.

2025 Available in English

cover page of plastics treaty finance mechanism

There is broad agreement among negotiators of the plastics treaty around establishing a just transition for waste pickers, Indigenous Peoples and other grassroots groups as a key tenet of the agreement. Achieving this requires a well designed finance mechanism which places funds directly in the hands of these groups, who are central to achieving the treaty's objectives.

Historically, finance mechanisms of international treaties have been difficult for grassroots groups and even some national governments to access, despite strong evidence that community-led approaches are highly cost effective and impactful. However, recent years have seen a proliferation of promising changes when it comes to access, and this is having ripple effects across the multilateral environmental agreement landscape. There are clear lessons for negotiators to take heed of as the plastics treaty finance mechanism is designed.

With appropriate treaty text regarding the aims of the finance mechanism to guide it, a new independent fund would have the freedom to establish accessible and predictable finance modalities along the lines of those considered in this paper and to set aside a portion of its funding for disbursement via these modalities to grassroots groups including waste pickers. With appropriate language that allows for future innovations in the medium term, this fund could secure contributions from the private sector ensuring it remains adequately resourced to achieve its aims.

Over recent years, the finance mechanisms of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Convention (BBNJ) have introduced a number of promising innovations that open up finance to grassroots groups. The agreement at the CBD COP 16 in relation to the Cali Fund, for example, was that ‘at least half of the funding should support the self-identified needs of Indigenous Peoples and local communities’. And in the Adaptation Fund, up to US$5 million is available to each country to set up a nationally administered small grants programme for grassroots groups. 

The INC needs to learn from these and other examples of Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) explored in this paper. 

We recommend that the INC follow the example of recent MEAs by:

  1. Establishing a new independent global fund as part of the finance mechanism
  2. Focusing this fund on ‘ensuring efficient access to funding through simplified application and approval procedures and enhanced readiness of support for […] developing States Parties’, with a substantial proportion set aside to meet waste pickers’ (and other grassroots groups’) ‘self-identified needs’ through accessible funding modalities 
  3. Ensuring that this new fund is adequately resourced, in part by giving the COP the mandate to establish a mechanism for private sector contributions
  4. Making direct access and predictability a priority for the finance mechanism as a whole, with its aims, governance arrangements and reporting systems reflecting this

Share this resource

If you found this resource useful, please share it with others so they can benefit too.

Get our email updates

Be the first to hear about our latest learning and resources

Sign up now - Get our email updates